|
週次 Wk
|
日期
Date
|
課程內容
Content
|
備註
Note
|
|
1
|
2/22
|
導論 (Course, Teacher & Students)
|
|
|
2
|
3/1
|
228補假
|
|
|
3
|
3/8
|
大法官相關解釋 ＆ 國內文獻回顧
|
鄭世欣
楊仲庭
李承哲
|
|
4
|
3/15
|
大法官相關解釋 ＆ 國內文獻回顧
|
許文豪
金希
謝芷瑄
|
|
5
|
3/22
|
大法官相關解釋 ＆ 國內文獻回顧
|
殷杰
劉大慶
曾宥鈞
|
|
6
|
3/29
|
Erwin Chemerinsky, Substantive Due Process, 15
Touro L Rev 1501-1534 (1999).
Erwin Chemerinsky, Procedural Due Process
Claims, 16 Touro L Rev
871-893 (2000).
|
師
|
|
7
|
4/5
|
學術交流週
|
|
|
8
|
4/12
|
Lawrence Alexander, The Relationship between
Procedural Due Process and Substantive Constitutional Rights, 39 U Fla L
Rev 323-343 (1987).
James W Ely Jr., Oxymoron Reconsidered: Myth
and Reality in the Origins of Substantive Due Process, 16 Const Comment 315-345
(1999).
|
許文豪
關治為
|
|
9
|
4/19
|
Rosalie B Levinson, Reining In Abuses of
Executive Power through Substantive Due Process, 60 Florida L Rev 519-587
(2008).
Peter J Rubin, Square Pegs and Round Holes:
Substantive Due Process, Procedural Due
Process
aaand
the Bill of Rights, 103 Columbia L Rev 833-892 (2003).
|
金希
關治維
|
|
10
|
4/26
|
Daniel O Conkle, Three Theories of Substantive
Due Process, 85 N C L Rev 63-148 (2006).
Kermit Roosevelt, Forget the Fundamentals:
Fixing Substantive Due Process, 8 U Penn J Const L 983-1004 (2006).
|
謝芷瑄
殷杰
|
|
11
|
5/3
|
Ryan C Williams, The One and Only Substantive
Due Process Clause, 120 Yale L J 408-512 (2010).
Timothy M. Tymkovich, Joshua Dos Santos & Joshua
J. Craddock, A Workable Substantive Due Process, 95 Notre Dame L Rev
1961-2010 (2020).
|
楊仲庭
鄭世欣
|
|
12
|
5/10
|
Jerry L Mashaw, The Supreme Court’s Due Process
Calculus for Administrative Adjudication in Mathews v. Eldridge: Three
Factors in Search of a Theory of Value, 44 U Chi L Rev 28-59 (1976-77).
Edward L Rubin, Due Process and the
Administrative State, 72 Cal L Rev 1044 -1079 (1984).
|
許文豪
楊仲庭
|
|
13
|
5/17
疫情改線上
|
Martin H. Redish & Lawrence C. Marsha,
Adjudicatory Independence and the Values of Procedural Due Process, 95 Yale
L J 455-505 (1986).
Ronald J. Krotoszynski Jr., Expropriatory
Intent: Defining the Boundaries of Substantive Due Process and the Taking
Clause, 80 N.C. L. Rev, 713-772 (2002).
|
曾宥鈞
李承哲
|
|
14
|
5/24
|
期末報告寫作
|
|
|
15
|
5/31
|
期末報告寫作
|
|
|
16
|
6/7
|
期末報告（一）
報告人 1： 鄭世欣：從正當法律程序論大法官迴避制度
評論人：殷杰，金希、楊仲庭
報告人 2：李承哲：從正當程序原則檢視預防接種受害救濟審議於因果關係之判斷
評論人：許文豪，金希
|
|
|
17
|
6/14
|
端午節
|
|
|
18
|
6/21
09:10~ 12:00
|
期末報告（二）
報告人 1： 曾宥鈞：論土地徵收的正當程序
評論人：謝芷瑄，鄭世欣，殷杰
報告人 2：論大陸地區人民強制出境與收容的正當法律程序—兼評大法官解釋第 710 號解釋 評論人：謝芷瑄，曾宥鈞
報告人 3：謝芷瑄：論限制人身自由的防疫措施 應遵行的正當程序
評論人：曾宥鈞，許文豪
|
|
|
19
|
6/28
|
期末報告（三）
報告人 1：殷杰：論強制施打疫苗的正當法律程 序
評論人：鄭世欣，李承哲，關治維
報告人 2：許文豪：論釋字 535 號解釋後警察臨 檢之正當程序—以酒測臨檢為中心 評論人：：李承哲、劉大慶
|
|