Three samples with
same thickness (same amount of water + starch).
All pictures are taken
for two different magnifications same camera opening and focus.
IMPORTANT: both for the integral samples and
magnified
central part the camera position and openings were
the same for the three different samples
six samples
with different thicknesses, and same drying conditions
all samples
are recorded as integral and magnified central part. Scales are:
![]()
sample 1. thickness measurments: 12.10; 12.04; 11.9; 12.19; 12.12 (mm)
average thickness: 12.07 mm![]()
sample 2. thickness measurments: 7.93; 8.12; 7.90; 8.13; 7.77 (mm)
average thickness: 7.97 mm![]()
sample 3. thickness measurments: 4.73; 4.93; 5.01; 4.67; 4.61 (mm)
average thickness: 4.79 mm![]()
sample 4. thickness measurments: 2.58; 2.64; 2.39; 2.51; 2.86 (mm)
average thickness: 2.596 mm![]()
sample 5. thickness measurments: 1.46; 1.27; 1.22; 1.37; 1.29 (mm)
average thickness: 1.322 mm![]()
sample 6. thickness measurments: 0.26; 0.61; 0.55; 0.42; 0.39 (mm)
average thickness: 0.446 mm![]()
IMPORTANT: both for the integral samples and magnified
central part the camera position and openings were
the same for the six different samples
COMPARISON WITH OTHER CRACK PATTERNS
- Mud cracks with random polygons is similar to those bounded by straight cracks, while cracks in SiO2 layer shows similarities to sample 5 above
(source: http://mobydick.physics.utoronto.ca/):
![]()
- cm-scale lab experiment (Skjeltorp & Meakin) shows no straight cracks (yet?), while dried mud field shows short straight cracks bounding incomplete diffusive cracks
(source: T. Vicsek's book Fractal Growth Phenomena, 2nd ed., World Scientific, 1992):
![]()
Last updated October 1, 2002 ©KtL